How We Review: The Method, Published
This is the method, written down so you can use it without us and challenge it where you disagree. 30JILI is an independent guide: not a casino, no deposits accepted, no balances held, no games run. Nothing here is scored or ranked, and the last section explains why that is deliberate.
What we check
- Licence disclosure — is the operating company named where a reader can find it, and does the name appear in the regulator's own published records?
- Payment rails and KYC — which methods exist, is verification explained before you deposit, and does the site keep rail speed separate from its own approval queue?
- Terms clarity — can a first-time reader find withdrawal conditions, bonus wagering rules and the dormancy clause without a search box?
- Complaint route — is there an escalation path beyond live chat, and is the regulator's channel acknowledged?
- Responsible-gaming tools — are deposit limits, cooling-off and self-exclusion in the account area rather than only in the footer?
- Support channels — how many, what hours, and does any of them leave a written record you can escalate with?
- App distribution — does the site describe store availability honestly, or push an installer, a mirror or a configuration profile from a domain it does not control?
All seven are answerable by reading. None of them requires an account, which matters, because we do not have one.
Reachable and unreachable
| We can establish | We cannot |
|---|---|
| That a company name and licence reference are published and match the regulator's list | Whether that company will pay you, at your amount, this week |
| That required pages exist and what their wording commits to | Whether a support agent is useful the day you write in |
| Where a site contradicts its own pages | What is happening inside its approval queue |
| Which payment brands appear and how those rails behave publicly | Payout times, fees and minimums — set by the operator, so check its cashier page |
| Whether a published RTP matches the studio's figure | Which configuration of a game a lobby is running |
Where a figure cannot be sourced it does not appear. A gap is honest about our confidence. A plausible number would not be.
Sentences this site will not contain
- "We tested the withdrawal." We hold no accounts anywhere
- A fee, minimum or payout time for an operator we cannot query
- A licence number we have not seen in the regulator's own records
- A score, a star count or a ranking position
- An author name, biography or photograph that does not correspond to a real person
- A max win, bonus value or player count we cannot source
Money, and what it does not buy
Some outbound links may be partner links earning a commission on a click. The arrangement does not vary with what a page says. No operator sees a draft, no wording is softened on request, and no page is removed because a company objected. If that were ever the condition, the page would remain and the arrangement would end.
There is no score to buy because there is no score. A ranking table is the most saleable thing a site in this market could build, so this one has not built it.
Dates, authorship, corrections
Pages carry published and modified dates and are credited to the site rather than a person. We do not manufacture reviewers, qualifications or photographs — an invented expert would be the least verifiable claim on an otherwise careful page. Corrections are made in the page itself, with the date updated, and being shown an error is more useful than defending one.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why are there no scores?
A score looks objective while hiding the judgement inside it, and a ranking position is the easiest thing in this industry to sell. Publishing the checks keeps the reasoning visible and leaves the conclusion with you.
Do you earn money from outbound links?
Possibly — some may be partner links paying a commission on a click. It changes nothing in the text, and no advertiser previews a page before publication.
Can you tell me how fast an operator pays?
No. Approval times, fees and minimums are set by the operator; check its cashier page and get support's answer in writing. What is independently verifiable is the rails: InstaPay is real-time within a per-transaction cap, PESONet settles in batches on banking days.
Do you verify licences yourself?
We compare the operating company name a site publishes against the regulator's own published records, and we explain how to repeat the check. We cannot audit a regulator's files or confirm a licence's internal standing.
Who writes these pages?
The site, under its own name. There is no reviewer persona, because one we invented could not be verified by you — and no byline is more honest than a fictional one.